to cover page
back to previous page
go to next page

Questions on exchange rate
Like many members in my club I am somewhat concerned at the disparity between the exchange rate on the international money market and the rate charged by Rotary International for the payment of dues to the United States.

The former is US77 cents (February 29, 2004), but the Rotary International rate is US72 cents.
This means that for every subscription paid to the U.S., Rotary International is making a profit of at least five per cent.

What happens to this profit?
How often is the exchange rate for Rotary International dues established?
Does this practice conform with The 4-Way Test?
R.E. Impey
Rotary Club of Proserpine, Qld.

Sad news . . . good news
In Mailbox (February, 2004) under the heading Don’t Mention Two Things, the Rotary Club of Orange Daybreak, N.S.W., advised that its exchange student, Guillaume (Gui) Jamart, had returned to Belgium because of the failing health of his father, Phillipe.

Sadly, Phillipe passed away just before Christmas. Our hearts went out to Guillaume and his family as did our prayers and special thoughts.

Although optimistic, we did not expect Guillaume to return to Australia. However, such was the desire of his father for Gui to undertake the Youth Exchange Program (YEP), we were thrilled to learn that Gui would complete his exchange. With the blessings of his family, Gui returned to Australia and into the welcoming arms of his Rotary Family at Orange Daybreak.
Being a keen sportsman, Gui was eager to fulfil one of his dreams by attending the Australian Open tennis in Melbourne, Vic.

Thanks to efforts of his host mother, Catherine Hennessy, and Orange Daybreak’s international service director, Nan Stevenson, and the willingness of President-elect David Shave, of the Rotary Club of Melbourne LaTrobe, Vic., to accommodate Gui and generally keep a watchful eye, a dream was realised.
When asked how he enjoyed the experience, Gui’s response of “C’etait magnifique”, plus a grin from ear to ear, said it all.

More recently, Gui was keen to meet up with other students from Belgium, including several YEP students currently hosted by Wollongong Rotary clubs. Again, with the generosity of yet another Rotarian, Doctor Carol Jeffs, this excursion became possible.

Through the assistance of Rotarians, not formerly known to us, these special trips became a reality for a very grateful exchange student. These are indeed wonderful examples of Rotarians lending a hand to help others. We thank you.
Nan Stevenson
Rotary Club of Orange Daybreak, N.S.W.

In the red and happy about it
“I’ll take the red hat’’ . . . Rotary Club of Melbourne South, Vic., members say this at every weekly meeting. Actually, it’s a red cap, the club’s work cap.

By saying this, it means that the cost of the meal ($A24) goes toward supporting the three Foster Parents Plan children the club has sponsored.

The foregoing of a meal is a small price to pay for looking after these children and it means a nil cost to the club.

The club’s caterers agreed to let two spaces be available for this purpose. Each week the red hatters are recorded in The Swan, the club bulletin.

 

FROM THE R.I.
SOUTH PACIFIC & PHILIPPINES
OFFICE
with Manager Harley Tarrant

Unwillingness to change – a barrier to membership growth. One of the greatest drawbacks to membership growth in Rotary clubs is unwillingness to change. Each club develops a culture and tradition of its own and this is a healthy thing.
However, too often the practices and customs of the club take on a kind of biblical authority.

Because many Rotarians rarely make up, at least beyond their home town, they assume that the customs they observe are followed throughout the world. In fact, customs and practices differ greatly from country to country, state to state, and club to club.

When Rotary began in U.S.A. in 1905 and in Australia in 1921 the practices of the day were adopted. If Rotary were to begin now, we would adopt practices compatible with modern society. Practices that were once commonplace in our society may today be considered old-fashioned and,
sometimes, embarrassing. Yet, many clubs cling to these outmoded practices without ever examining their usefulness or relevance. By insisting on maintaining old-fashioned practices a club can make itself unattractive to others in the community, especially to younger business people. As the members grow older, they may cling more strongly to their outmoded ways and cut themselves and their club off from their community. It is important to uphold ethical principles, but it can be destructive to cling to meaningless customs merely because a club has always done things that way.

All clubs should periodically examine their procedures and customs and ask whether they are still relevant or whether they have become a barrier to membership growth. Senior members, like myself, must be prepared to step back out of the limelight and allow younger Rotarians some latitude in making their clubs more attractive to potential Rotarians rather than insisting that things always be done in the manner they are accustomed to and with which they are comfortable.

All organisations must be prepared to change with the times or they risk becoming dinosaurs. Often, the greatest danger to a club’s survival is the insistence on maintaining
meaningless and outmoded practices.

 
go to next page

.

 

.

.

.

.

.